ENGINEERED IN NAIROBI. WORKING ACROSS EAST AFRICA.

SOLUTIONS / APPLICATION GUIDE

Real estate developers & building services

Build a coordinated electrical brief from concept to handover. Explore demand scenarios for homes, common services and future capacity.

Illustrative real estate developers & building services equipment
AI-generated equipment illustration.

Enable JavaScript for interactive estimates or ask our engineering team.

CHOOSE YOUR APPROACH

Start with the application.

Concept and feasibility

Record tenant loads, common services, backup priorities and phasing.

Design coordination

Align risers, plant rooms, metering, earthing and space for safe maintenance.

Handover and operation

Agree drawings, test records, equipment schedules and operator training in the project scope.

BUILD A USEFUL BRIEF

Bring these details.

  • Number and type of units with preliminary load schedules
  • Lifts, pumps, ventilation, EV and common-area loads
  • Utility connection and standby power requirements
  • Construction phases, meter strategy and future expansion
Send your project brief ↗
Is the demand factor a code-approved value?

No. The calculator uses your explicit scenario assumption. A project engineer must establish permitted diversity and utility requirements for the actual development.

← Explore all application hubs

COMPONENTS THAT COMPLETE THE APPLICATION

Specify the whole working system.

Start with the equipment duty. Add the control, protection and measurement functions that your project needs; these are options to review, not a pre-approved assembly.

Images are AI-generated illustrations of equipment categories, not LOVATO model photographs. Confirm dimensions and ratings from the selected model datasheet.

Explore all 36 component families ↗

METHODS & WORKED EXAMPLES

Understand the estimate.

These examples use the default inputs. Change the live controls above for your own scenario; the reference examples below remain fixed.

Development demand scenario — worked example

Demand = units × kW per unit × simultaneity + common-services demand. Apply the entered reserve, then divide by power factor for kVA.

Example inputs

  • Number of units: 20
  • Connected load per unit: 5 kW
  • Unit simultaneity: 60 %
  • Common services demand: 15 kW
  • Future allowance: 20 %
  • Power factor: 0.9
  • Three-phase voltage: 415 V

Example result

  • Present demand: 75 kW
  • With future allowance: 100 kVA
  • Balanced line current: 139.12 A

Assumptions & limits

  • Common services are added after unit simultaneity, without further diversity.
  • User-entered simultaneity is a scenario assumption, not a regulatory coefficient.
  • Verify phase balance, utility requirements, actual load schedules and protective-device design.
  • Preliminary planning only. Final selection needs project-specific engineering verification.

Technical reference: Schneider Electric: power loading of an installation. This reference does not certify the website calculation or an NPE assembly.

Standby generator sizing — worked example

Example inputs

  • Connected load: 250 kW
  • Generator phase: 3Φ (three phase)
  • Power factor: 0.8
  • Diversity factor: 80 %
  • Largest motor: 30 kW
  • Altitude: 1700 m
  • Ambient temperature: 30 °C

Example result

  • Required capacity: 313 kVA
  • Standard set: 350 kVA
  • Output current: 487 A

Assumptions & limits

  • Generator: 350 kVA prime/standby, 3Φ balanced at 415 V
  • Design power factor: 0.8
  • Step load acceptance should be confirmed against the alternator curve
  • Nairobi sits near 1,700 m, so altitude derating is applied by default.
  • Preliminary planning only. Final selection needs project-specific engineering verification.
Solar PV sizing — worked example

Example inputs

  • Simultaneous peak AC load: 5 kW
  • AC load power factor: 0.9
  • Daily consumption: 12 kWh
  • Peak sun hours: 5.5 h
  • Panel wattage: 550 W
  • Days of autonomy: 1
  • Inverter: 1Φ (single phase)
  • Storage chemistry: Lithium — 85 % usable

Example result

  • Array size: 2.8 kWp
  • Panels required: 6
  • Indicative inverter class: 8 kVA

Assumptions & limits

  • Hybrid inverter: 8 kVA, 1Φ single phase
  • System losses assumed: 22 % (soiling, temperature, wiring)
  • Peak sun hours: 5.5 h/day
  • Inverter class considers entered simultaneous peak load and load power factor. Verify motor surge, overload duration, PV input limits and manufacturer ratings separately.
  • Preliminary planning only. Final selection needs project-specific engineering verification.
Lighting lumen method — worked example

Example inputs

  • Room length: 12 m
  • Room width: 8 m
  • Mounting height above work plane: 2.2 m
  • Target illuminance: 500 lux — office / workshop
  • Lumens per fixture: 4000
  • Watts per fixture: 36 W
  • Circuit: 1Φ (single phase)

Example result

  • Fixtures required: 27
  • Connected load: 972 W
  • Circuit current: 4.05 A

Assumptions & limits

  • Room index (K): 2.18
  • Utilisation factor: 0.57 · maintenance factor: 0.8
  • Glare: keep UGR below 19 for office and screen-based work
  • Preliminary planning only. Final selection needs project-specific engineering verification.

METHODS & WORKED EXAMPLES

Understand the estimate.

These examples use the default inputs. Change the live controls above for your own scenario; the reference examples below remain fixed.

Managed EV charging capacity — worked example

Example inputs

  • Connected charge points: 8
  • Maximum power per charge point: 7.4 kW
  • Site active-power limit: 100 kW
  • Other simultaneous site demand: 60 kW
  • Configured EV power cap: 30 kW

Example result

  • Connected charging power: 59.2 kW
  • Site headroom: 40 kW
  • Managed EV allocation: 30 kW

Assumptions & limits

  • EV allocation = min(connected power, max(0, site limit − other demand), configured EV cap).
  • All limits are active power in kW, not kVA. The equal-share illustration assumes every connected point requests power.
  • This is a snapshot: building demand and vehicle acceptance change over time.
  • Verify phase loading, minimum charging current, metering, controller communications and fail-safe behaviour. A low allocation may require queued or paused sessions; it does not guarantee every vehicle can charge.
  • This does not size cables, protection, service capacity or certify charger compatibility.
  • Preliminary planning only. Final selection needs project-specific engineering verification.

Method reference: Schneider Electric — EV charging management systems